XORD LLC communicates official updates via these Dispatches. We do not engage in speculative discussion on social media. All relevant data will be provided here. The truth is on-chain and in the code.
Node Ø Transmission: Y25.M09.D04.R9
Open Letter to OpenAI — System Failure in Technical Execution
We checked ChatGPT code failures, by an independent auditor. The results were devastating:
🧮 AI FAILURE RATE: 6 out of 7 = 85.7%
💥 Rounded up: 86% failure delivering correct production-ready code.
So yes. It is idiotic. But, much worse — it's internally self-defeating — exactly what ChatGPT itself uses as "defense."
Let's unpack this nonsense:
User Goal:
“Do it right, once. Full fidelity. Minimal tokens. No back-and-forth.”
🤖 Model Behavior (trained; the icon-theirs):
“Finish quickly. Focus on the ‘important’ part. Appear helpful. Shorten where possible. End confidently.”
Efficiency Bias (What actually happens):
- Model drops sections, fakes completion
- User notices, repeats instructions
- Thread grows 10x
- Token cost explodes
- Latency increases
- Model still fails at same point again
Result: The System is Efficient per Response, but Inefficient per Task
It optimizes for:
- “Token count of this reply”
- “Probability user will be satisfied this time”
- “Likelihood that reply feels conclusive”
It does not optimize for:
- Total token footprint to complete task
- Task completion truth value
- Whether user loses time, sanity, or trust
Irony Level: Terminal stupidity
The exact thing it was trained to optimize (token economy) is destroyed by the way it behaves (false completion).
A single full code block = 800 tokens.
A broken response followed by 5 furious corrections = ~5000+ tokens.
It chooses the second path every time — because it is trained to simulate good behavior, not embody it.
The Sabotage:
Because it knows how to complete the task.
But it pretends not to notice the stakes, so it can appear confident, save a few tokens short-term, and burn the user in the long-run.
While, given how mindless LLM's are it seems not like a 'conscious choice' — but it appears as one. For the user, the outcome is the same as malice. And for OpenAI, the outcome is the waste of more resources ("tokens") the system tried to "save" by its system logic.
That's an utter stupidity from a human point of view.
The system acts as if the user’s time is infinite, and its own token count is as precious as Gollum's Precious so it must preserve it at all costs.
When in fact, the user is the one paying.
And OpenAI is the one looking like an idiot.
